Wipro vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Wipro (4.0/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Wipro is the stronger option for enterprises wanting a long-established Indian IT giant with diversified capabilities. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Wipro vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Wipro | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1945 | 2000 |
| HQ | Bengaluru, India | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 242,000+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Eight decades of corporate history and a 240,000-person global delivery workforce | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, SAP | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Banking, Healthcare, Technology, Manufacturing | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Wipro vs Endava: overview
Wipro
Wipro's roots trace back to 1945 as a vegetable oil manufacturer, an unusual origin story for a company that now employs more than 242,000 people delivering IT services, consulting, and business process outsourcing worldwide. Headquartered in Bengaluru, its client base spans banking, healthcare, and technology sectors, with cloud and digital engineering as growth practices layered onto a decades-old enterprise services core. Like its Indian IT-giant peers, its size means structured account management rather than direct founder access.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: Wipro vs Endava
| Capability | Wipro | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Wipro vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Wipro | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Wipro vs Endava
| Criterion | Wipro | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Managed services | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Wipro vs Endava
| Dimension | Wipro | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Banking, Healthcare, Technology | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A bank or healthcare enterprise wanting a long-established Indian IT giant., An enterprise consolidating IT services and business process outsourcing under one vendor. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Wipro vs Endava: pros and cons
| Wipro | |
|---|---|
| + | Eight decades of corporate history, longer than any other company on this list. |
| + | Large, diversified delivery workforce spanning IT services and business process outsourcing. |
| + | Established banking and healthcare practices. |
| - | Structured, process-heavy engagement model typical of a 240,000+ person organization |
| - | Growth in cloud/digital practices is newer relative to its core legacy IT services business |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose Wipro?
A typical fit: a bank or healthcare enterprise wanting a long-established Indian IT giant.
Eight decades of corporate history and a 240,000-person global delivery workforce. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Banking, Healthcare, Technology, Manufacturing.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Wipro vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Wipro |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Wipro (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Wipro |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Wipro vs Endava
| Use case | Wipro fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A bank or healthcare enterprise wanting a long-established Indian IT giant. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An enterprise consolidating IT services and business process outsourcing under one vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Wipro vs Endava
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Wipro (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need an enterprise consolidating IT services and business process outsourcing under one vendor. If your situation matches that, Wipro is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Wipro vs Endava FAQ
Is Wipro better than Endava?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Wipro's strongest advantage: eight decades of corporate history, longer than any other company on this list. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do Wipro and Endava differ in pricing?
Wipro uses enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Wipro or Endava?
Wipro is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Wipro and Endava?
Wipro's primary differentiator is: eight decades of corporate history and a 240,000-person global delivery workforce. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (242,000+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Banking, Healthcare vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.