EPAM Systems vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for enterprises wanting giant-scale delivery built on Eastern European engineering talent. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2000 |
| HQ | Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA (large Ukraine delivery centers) | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, Cloud platforms, Data engineering | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
EPAM Systems vs Endava: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems was founded in 1993 and trades on the New York Stock Exchange, headquartered in Newtown, Pennsylvania, with more than 50,000 employees globally and a large Ukraine-based delivery workforce specifically. That's a different geographic bet than the India-anchored giants on this list: EPAM built its reputation on Central and Eastern European engineering talent rather than the traditional offshore-India model, giving it a distinct technical-culture reputation among the mega-scale vendors. Public-company scale still means formal enterprise sales cycles and account structures.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Capability | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | N/A | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Retail, Healthcare | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | An enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model., A buyer that wants a publicly traded, audited vendor with strong Eastern European engineering culture. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
EPAM Systems vs Endava: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement. |
| + | Built its reputation on Central and Eastern European engineering culture, a distinct positioning among the giants. |
| + | Consulting and engineering practices spanning cloud, data, and AI at real scale. |
| - | Global public-company scale means enterprise sales cycles and account structures suited to large budgets |
| - | Smaller total headcount than the India-anchored giants, which matters for the very largest programs |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: an enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model.
Publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Retail, Healthcare, Travel.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs Endava
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An enterprise wanting giant-scale delivery capacity without the traditional offshore-India model. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that wants a publicly traded, audited vendor with strong Eastern European engineering culture. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs Endava
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. Publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs Endava FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than Endava?
EPAM Systems (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: publicly traded scale with audited financials, useful for enterprise procurement. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do EPAM Systems and Endava differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses enterprise consulting and dedicated-team engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or Endava?
EPAM Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and Endava?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: publicly traded US scale built on a Central and Eastern European delivery model instead of the traditional offshore-India approach. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (50,000+ globally; large Ukraine workforce vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services, Retail vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.