Endava vs Tallium: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Endava (4.1/5) edges ahead of Tallium (3.7/5) overall. Endava is the better choice for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. Tallium is the stronger option for buyers who want a real number before a first sales call. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs Tallium: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 2012 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Kyiv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure) |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | The only company on this list with a publicly published hourly rate and a top GoodFirms rating |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Time & materials, published at $25-$49/hr per GoodFirms |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | React, Node.js, .NET |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Retail, Enterprise software |
Endava vs Tallium: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Tallium
Every giant on this list quotes enterprise engagements privately; Tallium, founded in Kyiv in 2012, simply posts its rate on GoodFirms instead: $25-$49 per hour, backed by a 5.0-star rating across more than 40 verified reviews. That transparency alone sets it apart from every mega-giant and mid-market firm reviewed here, none of which publish pricing publicly, and it makes genuine cost comparison possible before a first call rather than after weeks of sales process. Its boutique scale suits single-team engagements rather than the multi-hundred-person programs the giants exist to staff.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs Tallium
| Capability | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Framework / platform | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Criterion | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs Tallium
| Dimension | Endava | Tallium |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Retail, Enterprise software |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | A cost-conscious buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing before a first call., A small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Time & materials |
Endava vs Tallium: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| Tallium | |
|---|---|
| + | Published hourly rate gives buyers real pricing transparency no other company on this list offers. |
| + | 5.0-star GoodFirms rating across more than 40 verified reviews at time of writing. |
| + | Kyiv-founded and Kyiv-based development team. |
| - | Boutique team size limits capacity to single-team engagements rather than enterprise-scale programs |
| - | No named industry specialization beyond general custom development |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose Tallium?
A typical fit: a cost-conscious buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing before a first call.
The only company on this list with a publicly published hourly rate and a top GoodFirms rating. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Retail, Enterprise software.
Decision matrix: Endava vs Tallium
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs Tallium (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Tallium |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs Tallium
| Use case | Endava fit | Tallium fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A cost-conscious buyer wanting transparent, published hourly pricing before a first call. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs Tallium
Endava (4.1/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms.
Tallium (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need a small to mid-size project that doesn't require enterprise-scale delivery capacity. If your situation matches that, Tallium is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs Tallium FAQ
Is Endava better than Tallium?
Endava (4.1/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. Tallium's strongest advantage: published hourly rate gives buyers real pricing transparency no other company on this list offers.
How do Endava and Tallium differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Tallium uses time & materials, published at $25-$49/hr per goodfirms pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or Tallium?
Tallium is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and Tallium?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Tallium's primary differentiator is: the only company on this list with a publicly published hourly rate and a top GoodFirms rating. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 50–150 (per company website; independently unverifiable precise figure)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Retail, Enterprise software).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.