Endava vs SoftServe: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
SoftServe (4.4/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. SoftServe is the better choice for large programs wanting Ukrainian-founded engineering at genuine mid-giant scale. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs SoftServe: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1993 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine / Austin, Texas (dual headquarters) |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 13,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | The largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce on this list, sized between the boutiques and the mega-giants |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Enterprise consulting engagements, typically dedicated-team or fixed-scope programs |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | AWS, Azure, GCP |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Healthcare, Financial services, Energy, Retail |
Endava vs SoftServe: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
SoftServe
Set SoftServe next to Accenture or TCS and the scale gap is obvious, but at more than 13,000 employees it still dwarfs every other Ukrainian-founded company reviewed here, three decades after its 1993 founding in Lviv. It runs dual headquarters in Lviv and Austin, Texas, with a full practice across custom software, cloud, data, and AI consulting, giving it real capacity for large multi-team programs without the account layers of a true mega-giant. It sits in an odd middle zone on this list: too large to be a boutique, too small to be a mega-giant.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs SoftServe
| Capability | Endava | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs SoftServe
| Framework / platform | Endava | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs SoftServe
| Criterion | Endava | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs SoftServe
| Dimension | Endava | SoftServe |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Healthcare, Financial services, Energy |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | A large program wanting Ukrainian-founded engineering at a scale most boutiques can't match., A US buyer wanting an onshore Austin contact for offshore-delivered work. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs SoftServe: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| SoftServe | |
|---|---|
| + | Largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce reviewed on this list, at a genuine mid-giant scale. |
| + | Dual Lviv/Austin headquarters gives US buyers an onshore point of contact. |
| + | Full-stack practice across cloud, data, and AI, beyond development capacity alone. |
| + | Established compliance track record in healthcare and financial services. |
| - | Still a fraction of the scale of Accenture, TCS, or Capgemini for the very largest global programs |
| - | Enterprise-scale process overhead that a smaller pilot project doesn't need |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose SoftServe?
A typical fit: a large program wanting Ukrainian-founded engineering at a scale most boutiques can't match.
The largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce on this list, sized between the boutiques and the mega-giants. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Energy, Retail.
Decision matrix: Endava vs SoftServe
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs SoftServe (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs SoftServe
| Use case | Endava fit | SoftServe fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A large program wanting Ukrainian-founded engineering at a scale most boutiques can't match. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A US buyer wanting an onshore Austin contact for offshore-delivered work. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs SoftServe
SoftServe (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. The largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce on this list, sized between the boutiques and the mega-giants.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs SoftServe FAQ
Is Endava better than SoftServe?
SoftServe (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. SoftServe's strongest advantage: largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce reviewed on this list, at a genuine mid-giant scale.
How do Endava and SoftServe differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. SoftServe uses enterprise consulting engagements, typically dedicated-team or fixed-scope programs pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or SoftServe?
SoftServe is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and SoftServe?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. SoftServe's primary differentiator is: the largest Ukrainian-founded engineering workforce on this list, sized between the boutiques and the mega-giants. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 13,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Healthcare, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.