Endava vs ELEKS: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
ELEKS (4.2/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. ELEKS is the better choice for enterprise buyers wanting three and a half decades of engineering history. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Endava vs ELEKS: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2000 | 1991 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | 11,300+ | 2,000+ |
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms | The longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company on this list |
| Pricing model | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements | Fixed-scope and dedicated-team enterprise engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Java, .NET, AWS | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail | Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services |
Endava vs ELEKS: overview
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
ELEKS
ELEKS opened in Lviv in 1991, a year before Ukraine itself declared independence, and has grown to more than 2,000 engineers over three and a half decades. Compared with the mega-giants on this list it's a small operation, but among boutique and mid-market firms it stands out for sheer institutional longevity, with deep healthcare, insurance, and financial technology practices built up over decades rather than years. That history buys a stable delivery process and senior bench, at the cost of any single named technical specialty as sharp as a true boutique's.
Services and capabilities: Endava vs ELEKS
| Capability | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✗ | ✓ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Framework / platform | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Criterion | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project | Dedicated team, Fixed project, Consulting |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Endava vs ELEKS
| Dimension | Endava | ELEKS |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Payments, Banking, Insurance | Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services |
| Best use cases | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | An insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system., A buyer that values decades of institutional history as a risk-reduction signal. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Dedicated team |
Endava vs ELEKS: pros and cons
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
| ELEKS | |
|---|---|
| + | Longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company reviewed here, since 1991. |
| + | Deep, verified healthcare and insurance regulatory experience. |
| + | Large enough team to staff multi-year enterprise programs. |
| - | Broad enterprise-consultancy positioning rather than one sharply named technical specialty |
| - | A fraction of the delivery capacity of the mega-giants on this list |
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Who should choose ELEKS?
A typical fit: an insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system.
The longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company on this list. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Insurance, Financial services.
Decision matrix: Endava vs ELEKS
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Endava |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Endava (Not published) vs ELEKS (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Endava |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Endava vs ELEKS
| Use case | Endava fit | ELEKS fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An insurance or financial services company modernizing a legacy core system. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer that values decades of institutional history as a risk-reduction signal. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Endava vs ELEKS
ELEKS (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. The longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company on this list.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Endava vs ELEKS FAQ
Is Endava better than ELEKS?
ELEKS (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. ELEKS's strongest advantage: longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company reviewed here, since 1991.
How do Endava and ELEKS differ in pricing?
Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. ELEKS uses fixed-scope and dedicated-team enterprise engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Endava or ELEKS?
Endava is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Endava and ELEKS?
Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. ELEKS's primary differentiator is: the longest continuous operating history of any non-giant company on this list. They also differ in team size (11,300+ vs 2,000+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Payments, Banking vs Healthcare, Insurance).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.