Capgemini vs Endava: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Capgemini (4.2/5) edges ahead of Endava (4.1/5) overall. Capgemini is the better choice for european enterprises and public-sector buyers wanting an EU-headquartered giant. Endava is the stronger option for payments and financial-services enterprises wanting mid-tier CEE delivery scale. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Capgemini vs Endava: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Capgemini | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1967 | 2000 |
| HQ | Paris, France | London, United Kingdom |
| Team size | 423,000+ | 11,300+ |
| Rating | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | European headquarters and decades of EU enterprise and public-sector relationships at global scale | A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements | Dedicated-team and consulting engagements |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | AWS, Azure, SAP | Java, .NET, AWS |
| Industries served | Public sector, Financial services, Manufacturing, Automotive | Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail |
Capgemini vs Endava: overview
Capgemini
Capgemini SE was founded on October 1, 1967 in Grenoble, France, and now employs more than 423,000 people from its Paris headquarters, with particularly strong relationships across European enterprise and public-sector clients. Its practice spans strategy consulting, technology services, and outsourced operations, and its French/European base gives it a different regulatory and cultural fit than the US- or India-headquartered giants on this list for buyers specifically serving EU markets. Scale and process depth come with the same enterprise-consulting pricing structure as its closest competitors.
Endava
Endava was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in London, with roughly 11,300 employees delivering outsourced software development and IT consulting primarily through Central and Eastern European delivery centers. Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, it occupies a mid-tier scale below the true mega-giants but well above most boutique firms, with named practices in payments, banking, and insurance technology. Its CEE-anchored delivery model puts it in similar territory to EPAM, though at roughly a fifth of EPAM's global headcount.
Services and capabilities: Capgemini vs Endava
| Capability | Capgemini | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Enterprise modernization | ✓ | ✗ |
| Cloud & DevOps | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI/ML development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom software development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: Capgemini vs Endava
| Framework / platform | Capgemini | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | ✓ | N/A |
| Java | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Capgemini vs Endava
| Criterion | Capgemini | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Consulting, Dedicated team, Managed services | Dedicated team, Consulting, Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Capgemini vs Endava
| Dimension | Capgemini | Endava |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Public sector, Financial services, Manufacturing | Payments, Banking, Insurance |
| Best use cases | A European enterprise or government agency wanting an EU-headquartered systems integrator., An automotive or manufacturing client needing a long-established European technology partner. | A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor., A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. |
| Typical project type | Consulting | Dedicated team |
Capgemini vs Endava: pros and cons
| Capgemini | |
|---|---|
| + | European headquarters and regulatory fit for EU enterprise and public-sector buyers. |
| + | Nearly six decades of continuous operation since 1967. |
| + | Full-spectrum capability from strategy consulting through managed operations. |
| + | Deep manufacturing and automotive vertical practices. |
| - | Enterprise consulting pricing structure similar to its largest global competitors |
| - | Less agile than a boutique for a narrowly scoped technical project |
| Endava | |
|---|---|
| + | Publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale. |
| + | Named payments, banking, and insurance technology practices. |
| + | Central and Eastern European delivery model with more than two decades of history. |
| - | Much smaller global delivery capacity than the true mega-giants for the largest programs |
| - | Less geographic diversity than firms with delivery centers across multiple continents |
Who should choose Capgemini?
A typical fit: a European enterprise or government agency wanting an EU-headquartered systems integrator.
European headquarters and decades of EU enterprise and public-sector relationships at global scale. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Public sector, Financial services, Manufacturing, Automotive.
Who should choose Endava?
A typical fit: a payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor.
A publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Payments, Banking, Insurance, Retail.
Decision matrix: Capgemini vs Endava
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Endava |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Capgemini |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Capgemini (Not published) vs Endava (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Capgemini |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Capgemini |
Use case fit: Capgemini vs Endava
| Use case | Capgemini fit | Endava fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| A European enterprise or government agency wanting an EU-headquartered systems integrator. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| An automotive or manufacturing client needing a long-established European technology partner. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A payments or banking enterprise wanting a publicly listed, CEE-delivered vendor. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| A buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Capgemini vs Endava
Capgemini (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most IT Outsourcing projects. European headquarters and decades of EU enterprise and public-sector relationships at global scale.
Endava (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need a buyer wanting mid-tier scale without mega-giant account layers. If your situation matches that, Endava is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Capgemini vs Endava FAQ
Is Capgemini better than Endava?
Capgemini (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Capgemini's strongest advantage: european headquarters and regulatory fit for EU enterprise and public-sector buyers. Endava's strongest advantage: publicly listed on the NYSE, giving financial transparency at a mid-tier scale.
How do Capgemini and Endava differ in pricing?
Capgemini uses enterprise consulting and managed-services engagements pricing. Endava uses dedicated-team and consulting engagements pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Capgemini or Endava?
Capgemini is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Capgemini and Endava?
Capgemini's primary differentiator is: european headquarters and decades of EU enterprise and public-sector relationships at global scale. Endava's primary differentiator is: a publicly listed, CEE-anchored delivery model at a scale between the mega-giants and boutique firms. They also differ in team size (423,000+ vs 11,300+), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Public sector, Financial services vs Payments, Banking).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.